Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 05:36

Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
"How does Claude AI ensure data privacy and security?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
6 Things to Do Before 9 A.M. to Reduce Your Stroke Risk, According to Experts - EatingWell
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
DNA from 9,000-year-old skeletons disproves migratory waves theory from South Africa - Earth.com
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Why am I more attracted to black men?
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
RFK Jr. Is Opening the Alternative Medicine Floodgates - Gizmodo
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Hillingdon heraldic designer appointed MBE for royal cypher - BBC
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
NASA Switches to Backup Fuel Line After Psyche Thruster Glitch - Gizmodo